Call Today for a Free Consultation

Facing the “Open and Obvious” Defense in a Slip and Fall Case

Home > Facing the “Open and Obvious” Defense in a Slip and Fall Case
A woman sitting on a mall floor after a slip and fall accident.

On This Page

Facing the “Open and Obvious” Defense in a Slip and Fall Case

Property owners have a duty to make their property reasonably safe for people who visit and to give adequate warning of hazardous conditions. Similarly, visitors have a duty to use reasonable care while they are on the premises. So how does the law apply in a situation where an obvious danger exists on the owner’s property and someone stumbles across that danger and gets hurt? Couldn’t it be argued that both the owner and the visitor were at fault?

In New York, the answers to these questions aren’t as simple as they would first appear. If an injured person files a lawsuit against the property owner seeking damages, a common defense that can be raised is that the danger was open and obvious, which New York law defines as a condition that “is readily observable by the reasonable use of one’s senses.” The defense attempts to put the majority of blame for the accident upon the plaintiff for the purpose of avoiding damages.

However, the open and obvious defense is imperfect. It only shields the property owner from being held liable for failing to warn the plaintiff. Visitors may still hold owners liable for failure to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition. The owner’s duty to warn decreases for an open and obvious condition and the plaintiff’s duty to avoid the condition increases, but the owner’s duty to remedy the condition remains the same.

All of this is relevant to the issue of comparative negligence and how it affects recovery of money damages. Comparative negligence means that if you slip and fall on someone’s property and the jury finds you partially at fault for not recognizing the hazardous condition, the amount of damages you receive will be reduced by the percentage of your negligence. But the owner’s failure to maintain the property still may be deemed the main cause of the accident. For example, if you had damages of $100,000 and the jury decides you were only 25 percent at fault, you would be awarded $75,000.

The lawyers at Goldberg Sager & Associates have extensive experience representing clients in slip and fall cases throughout New York City, including cases that raise the open and obvious danger defense. If you or a family member was hurt in a fall on someone else’s property, please call our Brooklyn office at 718-645-6677 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.

Marcel A. Sager

Marcel A. Sager

Managing Partner

Marcel A. Sager is licensed to practice law in New York, New Jersey, the District of Columbia, Illinois, local federal courts, the U.S. Tax Court, and the U.S. Supreme Court. He has a J.D. from Brooklyn Law School and an LL.M. (Masters) in Taxation from the New York University School of Law.

Meet Our Partners
Contact Us
Get a Free Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Practice Areas
- As Seen On -
Client Reviewed
Best Car Accident Lawyers in Brooklyn 2022
Peer Rated
Slip and Fall
0
Car Accident
0
Probate Estate Matter
$ 0 M
Car Accident
0
MTA Bus Accident
0
Behind every case, there’s a person.
At Silver Law, we are committed to serving people – not just winning cases.

With decades of combined legal experience, our team of compassionate, local attorneys is prepared to meet your unique legal challenges head-on, and provide the guidance you need to make the most informed decision possible.

Contact The Firm

Call today to schedule a meeting with a New York City family law and personal injury attorney

To speak with an accomplished lawyer for help with a divorce, following an accident, or fighting traffic violations, call Goldberg Sager & Associates at 718-645-6677 or contact us online for a free initial consultation.

Large historic courtroom with ornate wood trim and red gallery seating.